Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Same-sex marriage measures passing in Maryland and Maine


CLEVELAND — Maryland and Maine appeared poised to become the first states in the nation to back same-sex marriage at the ballot box Tuesday night, and other gay-marriage measures were on the ballot in Minnesota and Washington.
The issue had been before voters 32 times and had been rejected every time. But activists say public opinion has shifted since 2008, when California passed a constitutional amendment reserving marriage for heterosexual couples. A 2010 poll showed that, for the first time, more Americans supported gay marriage than opposed it, and in May, President Obama endorsed same-sex marriage.
A win in any of the four states would suggest that momentum is on the side of gay marriage activists, said Fred Sainzo, a spokesman at the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights group that has donated $5 million to gay marriage proponents in the four states.
“If Obama is reelected and if we pass two or three of these state ballot initiatives, this is good, solid momentum on behalf of equality,” he said. “It shows that Americans are willing to support equality at the ballot box.”
But those who believe marriage should be between one man and one woman dispute that.
“These are really specific states,” said Frank Schuberto, a California consultant who is running the anti-gay-marriage campaigns in the four states. “The fact that an uber-liberal state like Maine or Washington might go for same-sex marriage, it doesn't mean that the country has changed.”
Even if Minnesota voters side with gay-rights advocates, same-sex marriage will remain illegal there because of an existing law. The current measure, Amendment 1, seeks to put a same-sex marriage ban into the state’s constitution. With 29% of precincts reporting, just over 50% of voters opposed the amendment.
Maine’s initiative had been thought to have the best chance to pass. Question 1 asks voters to allow Maine to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Just three years ago, the state defeated a same-sex marriage bill at the ballot box. But a lengthy campaign to change voters' minds has persuaded some Mainers, said David Farmer, spokesman for Mainers United for Marriage.
“We're optimistic. We've had more than 250,000 one-on-one conversations with people; we are confident that those personal connections have worked to move folks,” he said earlier. Polls released in the days leading up to the election showed that 50.5% to 55% of Mainers planned to vote yes. With 37% of precincts reporting late Tuesday, Question 1 held a slim lead. The Associated Press predicted that it would pass.
Polls had indicated that Maryland and Washington were toss-ups. In both states, the Legislature passed and a Democratic governor signed a bill allowing same-sex marriage. And in both states, opponents collected enough signatures for a referendum on the law, putting it on hold in the meantime.
With about 80% of precincts reporting, Maryland’s referendum to uphold the law held a sizable lead -- putting Maryland on track to become the first state below the Mason-Dixon line to legalize gay marriage.
Washington voters — as well as those in Colorado and Oregon — also were weighing in on legalizing marijuana. Recent polls showed Washington’s Amendment 502 and Colorado’s Amendment 64 with a chance to win, but Oregon’s Measure 80 lagging. Early results from Colorado showed the measure with a slim margin.
Gay marriage is legal in the District of Columbia and six states — Vermont, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and New York. But 30 states have constitutional amendments prohibiting it and 11 more have laws banning it. A study released last month by Third Way, a moderate think tank, showed that support for gay marriage had risen 16 percentage points since 2004.
Still, for some voters, this election seems eerily similar to 2008, when Obama was running for president and an anti-gay marriage initiative was on the California ballot. Obama won, but so did Proposition 8, which overruled a state Supreme Court decision and added an amendment to the state constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman.
In 2010, a federal judge rejected Proposition 8, but his ruling is on hold pending appeal.
Los Angeles TV writer Jen Braeden, 32, remembers the disappointment of 2008 and is wary about the referendum in her home state of Maryland. Braeden, who lives with her girlfriend of three years, says she would like to wed if same-sex marriage becomes legal in Maryland, but isn't ready to get her hopes up.
“I definitely think things are changing. In 30 years, this will be a non-issue, like interracial marriage,” she said. “But national opinion is changing slowly, and as of right now, I don't know if we're there yet.”
Braeden said she was concerned about the presidential election as well, fearful that a Mitt Romney-Paul Ryan administration would make things even harder for gay and lesbian couples.
Same-sex marriage advocates have outspent their opponents nearly 3 to 1, pouring $32.7 million into the campaigns, to foes’ $11.3 million.
The fight will continue after election day. Lawmakers are prepared to introduce bills protecting same-sex marriage in the legislatures of Illinois, Delaware, Rhode Island and Hawaii.
“People on both sides feel strongly about what marriage is,” said Schubert, the campaign consultant. “From our perspective, it doesn't matter what a state decides to call a relationship. We'll continue to have this argument regardless.”

27 comments:

  1. I think that the benefits should be given to the couples of a man and a women. Only when there is a larger population of gay couples, there should be possible benefits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. there are a lot of gay couples...you probably just havent experienced anything like that because of where you live and the school you go to

      Delete
  2. I think it's pretty surprising that this passed. I think it has a lot to do with people wanting to be politically correct and not express their opinion if they are against gay marriage so the voice for it is louder.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It would be so awesome if same sex marriage was passed in the next four years. It is unconstitutional to keep it from happening. 50+ years ago when it was illegal for interracial marriage there was the same fight happening. They want equality, benefits, and the ability to say that this person who i love is my spouse.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There is no reason that gay couples should not be able to get married and enjoy the same benefits of marriage that heterosexual couples enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think the benefits should be given to any kind of marriage. Everyone has a right to get benefits married or not.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I dont think that gays should be able to marry each other. I dont think though that they deserve the rights that a marriage has without actually being married. I also think that every state should either allow or not allow it; not just certain states allowing it and rest of the states not allowing it.
    Sean Weldon

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe that Maryland and Maine made a great decision to legalize gay marriage. Unlike the legalizing of marijuana, they have a better chance of the federal government passing it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is surprising that so many states are still resisting gay marriage. The legalization of marijuana was just passed, which will directly affect the citizens of the states, whereas gay marriage still isn't passed and it only affects the individuals pushing for equality and choice. Some state's priorites are not in line.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think that if a couple is married they deserve the same benefits no matter the gender of the two individuals.
    Kayla

    ReplyDelete
  10. The real issue with gay marriage is that it either needs to be illegal in all states or legal in all states. Because some states have banned gay marriage and have laws against it they need to clarify that your marriage is not recognized in states other than where you were married. There needs to be consitancy with gay marriage so there is no questioin on your marriage when you move to other states.
    Tommy Turner

    ReplyDelete
  11. The parallels to the civil rights movements of the 1960s are unmistakeable. That being said, the legality of it seems to be approached in the proper way this election. Referendums and initiatives give a vote to the people, and if the majority of a state vote in factor of gay marriage, then gay marriage is legal. Our government gives the people the ability to chose what is legal and illegal; here it seems that two states have decided that same-sex marriage is legal.

    -Peter Kolb

    ReplyDelete
  12. I personally have no strong opinion on gay marriage. But I do believe the states need to be united on the issue. My main problem is that people that are married get benefits and some states by not allowing same-sex marriage, are denying people benefits.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am very happy to see the Main and Maryland have legalized gay marriage. It is another step in what I think is, the right direction. I think that it is unfair to those in states where it is not illegal yet for the reason of the benefits allowed through marriage. It is completely stupid that it isn't nationally legal, but I'm going to get into that. --- Ben P

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think that there are many opposing opinions on this topic and it depends on the different ideals of each person. I think it has become a matter of being politically correct.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I personally do not think gay marriage should be illegal. I think this is a step in the right direction and everyone deserves the benefits that come with being married.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Regardless of whether the issues passes or not in an individual state, the real issue is the problems that would occur between states. It needs to be the whole country or nothing, otherwise if a gay couple moves out or Maryland or Maine to a state that does not allow gay marriage, they will lose their rights.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think this is great for America because everyone deserves equal rights. Americ was founed on equality, and we can't keep denying their rights.
    Maclain Edwards

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think it is good that both Maine and Maryland both legalized gay marriage. It is good that gay people can now get the benefits of being married as everyone else.
    Popo

    ReplyDelete
  19. Whatever side of the issue you are on, I believe it is logical to legalize gay marriage in all fifty states. When there are such huge problems such as health care and the economy, why are we focusing on this type of issue? It is not in the government's best interest to upset such a large group of people.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It either needs to be legal in all the states or illegal in all of the states. However gays shouldnt recive special treetment for being different, yes they probably should get what heterosexuals get but beond that they shouldnt get anything else.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I dont have a opinion on gay marriage. I dont really care if its legal or not.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think gay marriage is ok because people should have the right to marry who ever they want. Gay people should get the same benefits of marriage as straight people. More states should change there laws.
    DERRICK MCLEAN

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think that gay marriage should be passed. Our constitution and whole country is based on freedom and I think it would be unconstitutional for our government to tell a group of people how to think.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I beleive in marriage as a sacrament in the Catholic Church, but outside of the Church I beleive it should be a right to marry whoever you want. There are advantages that marrried people receive, so someone should not be denied those rights due to thier sexual orientation.

    ReplyDelete
  25. the catholic church states that marriage should be a boond of love between a man ad women. everyone has their own veiws on gay marriage and that is the catholic churche's own veiw. i feel that gay marriages should be either be leagalized throughout the whole country or not. not just through each state seperatly

    ReplyDelete
  26. Honestly I think this is a good thing. There is nothing wrong with a same sex couple and they should get the same rights and privileges that a "normal" man + woman couple does. Hopefully soon this won't but such a controversial issue and their rights get approved.

    ReplyDelete