(Reuters) - An 18-year-old man who tried to set off what he thought was a car bomb outside a downtown Chicago bar on Friday night has been arrested and charged in a federal undercover sting, authorities said Saturday.
Adel Daoud, a U.S. citizen who lives in the Chicago suburb of Hillside, planned for months for the attack and prayed with a man who turned out to be an undercover agent before attempting to set off a bomb in a Jeep outside a bar, authorities said.


Daoud, who considered up to 29 possible targets, was charged with one count of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and one count of attempt to damage and destroy a building by means of an explosive.
The inert explosives posed no threat to the public and were supplied by undercover law enforcement, acting U.S. Attorney Gary Shapiro said in a statement. Daoud was closely monitored and offered several opportunities to change his mind.
According to an FBI affidavit, Daoud used email accounts starting in about October 2011 to gather and send materials "relating to violent jihad and the killing of Americans."
Daoud emailed a lengthy powerpoint presentation to several people defending the tactics of al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden and emailed himself several articles on Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born Muslim cleric who the U.S. said was a leader of al Qaeda's Yemen affiliate, the affidavit said.
Awlaki was killed in a drone strike in September 2011.
Daoud also was registered in an Internet forum where members "discuss violent jihad and distribute jihadist propaganda and related instructional materials," the affidavit said.
Two undercover FBI employees began corresponding with Daoud in May, exchanging several electronic messages with him in which he expressed an interest in "engaging in violent jihad, either in the United States or overseas," the affidavit said.
From late May to mid-June, Daoud sought guidance on whether to carry out an attack in the United States, then sought online resources on how to carry out an attack, the affidavit said.
CONSIDERED ATTACKING TOURIST ATTRACTIONS
An undercover FBI agent then was introduced to Daoud by one of the undercover employees as a cousin and operational terrorist living in New York, the affidavit said.
Daoud listed 29 possible targets on four handwritten pages from a notebook he showed the undercover agent at a meeting on August 6, including military recruiting centers, bars, malls and other Chicago-area tourist attractions, the affidavit said.
"Early in their conversation, Daoud emphasized that any attack they committed needed to be recognized as a 'terrorist attack,'" the affidavit states about the early August meeting.

He told the undercover agent at a meeting on August 23 that he had selected the bar targeted on Friday, the affidavit said. They met again in early September and then on Thursday viewed the green Jeep Cherokee with the inert explosive device at a storage unit in Bellwood, Illinois.
On Friday, Daoud met with the undercover agent in a Chicago suburb, and he led a prayer that the attack would succeed in killing many people as they drove the agent's vehicle to downtown Chicago, the affidavit said.
In downtown Chicago, Daoud picked up the Jeep that contained the purported explosives from a parking lot and drove it to the targeted bar, the affidavit said. They did not identify the bar.
Daoud walked to an alley about a block from the bar and tried to set off the device in the agent's presence before FBI agents arrested him, the affidavit said.
The case is not the first in which undercover agents have been used to gather evidence of suspected plots.
Four self-described anarchists have pleaded guilty to plotting to blow up a four-lane highway bridge near Cleveland in April and a fifth suspect is undergoing competency testing.
An undercover FBI agent sold the men inoperable detonators and plastic explosives, which they placed at the base of the bridge. Authorities said the five men had no ties to foreign militant groups.
A Moroccan man pleaded guilty in June to attempting a suicide bombing of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington in February. An undercover agent drove the suspect on the day of that planned attack.
Authorities also used undercover officers to gather evidence at the Chicago summit of the NATO military alliance in May. Three men described as anarchists were arrested then and accused of attempting to make Molotov cocktails to hurl at police.
Daoud had an initial appearance on Saturday before U.S. Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys in federal court in Chicago. He is being held pending a detention and preliminary hearing that is scheduled for 3 p.m. Monday.
Daoud faces up to life in prison if convicted of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction. The second charge calls for a sentence of from five to 20 years.
The undercovered agent was a very good liar. However, the agent could still be playing for both teams, instead of just the U.S. I think the explosives were hoaxed by the undercover agent. I am glad that the attack didn't fall through. Now we should all be aware of the dangers in the city.
ReplyDeleteI feel that this is ridiculous. They sent in an agent who basically helped create this plot with the man. The agent encouraged him the entire way and even supplies the "explosives". Even though this man is crazy and wanted to participate in terrorist activities, he still was encouraged by this agent. Without the supplies and goading on of the agent, who knows if he would actually go through with everything. This entire situation seems very fishy and unfair.
ReplyDeleteNicole Kvist
I'm so glad that his plan fell through! thank goodness the CIA agent was there the whole time. A couple comments mentioned the motives of the agent, but he was doing his job the whole time. He couldn't have busted him until he knew that the guy would go through with it or else the kid could have denied the whole plan.
ReplyDeleteThe actions of the agent make me feel much better in the US law enforcement system. By going undercover with the terrorist, the US was able to stop the attack before it happened after the guy persisted in going through with the plan. While some people may feel that government officials lying to people is wrong, in this situation, the actions of the agent were saving lives, which ultimately matters more.
ReplyDeleteI'm so happy that they stopped this guy because he could have ended the lives of many. This gives me a lot of reasurance about the job that our law enforcement system is doing. Although at the same time why didn't they just stop the whole operation when it started. I do not understand why the CIA had to draw out the whole process.
ReplyDeleteI cannot believe how many attacks we have that the government hides from us. It is scary how many people do not like America. The CIA is doing a wonderful job protecting our country. We should keep on using undercover agents to prevent attacks on America.
ReplyDeleteMaclain Edwards
Using undercover FBI agents is a more proactive approach to terrorism. If undercover agents can create connections with terrorists, they will be able to stop future attacks. However, the agent's actions have the potential to become corrupt. If the agent were to encourage the terrorist just so that the agent could arrest him, it would not be fair. In order for the agent's actions to be just, the agent would need to remain neutral and step in only when the terrorist is commited to their attack. Ultimately, the idea is good because it is saving lives and helping to stop terrorism.
ReplyDeleteI think it's unfair what happened to this kid. Yes he was talking about jihad but he had nothing to actually carry it out. He had no supplies, no contacts, and no real incentive. This agent, though, gave him everything he needed. The kid most likely wouldn't have carried this out as him alone. Think of it this way, you hate a teacher. And one day in class she pisses you off so much that you say in rage you are going to kill her. Well, a fellow student overhears you. After school, they approach you and hand you a gun, bullets, and support your thought of killing the teacher. Obviously that gives you more of an incentive to pull this off because you are enraged and have all the materials you need to pull this off. That's what happened to this kid. I'm not saying he should have gotten off spot free, but he should at least been monitored until he was a real threat. Until he was looking for a dealer to get his C4, until he gained more motivation to carry out his plan. At this point, he was only a potential threat. There are probably dozens of others we could have spent these resources on because they are more of a threat than this 19 year old kid who decided to voice his Very liberal opinions (though not right) on the internet.
ReplyDeleteI'm absolutely shocked to hear this because it was so close to home. I never really thought a terrorist attack would be plotted here in Chicago. I find it really sick that the man prayed in hopes of many people dying. I don't feel any sympathy for this man because the FBI did exactly what they were supposed to. I see that their tactic into this situation was to give this man the contacts to get the equipment to see if he would follow through with it. Just because the FBI happened to be the ones to supply the equipment first doesn't mean that the man wouldn't have eventually gotten it on his on. It's better to give the man fake supplies than to try to beat the clock and stop him from detonating a real bomb and putting the city in danger. If the man had gotten away with following through with his plan then the FBI would be harassed with the question of why they didn't do anything to stop it. This is the best way to approach terrorism in my eyes. Once you stealthly get inside the situation I feel it is easier to control it.
ReplyDeleteIt appears that the FBI is cleverly skirting charges of entrapment. They have carefully planned all of this so that they could encourage Daoud to try to set off the bomb so as to arrest him but not be legally found guilty of entrapping him. I think Daoud will try to defend himself with entrapment accusation but will fail in that attempt. It sickens me that a 19 year old guy would do this. Not only that but that he would pray for the deaths of many people simply to make a point. It doesnt surprise me however that he chose Chicago to stage this attack because it would have generateed huge headlines which I am sure is what Daoud was looking for and hoped would spread terror.
ReplyDeleteThe FBI did a very clever approach to this attempted terrorist attack. It was smart to send in an undercover agent to control the suspect without him knowing anything. It shows how clever the FBI can do this without committing entrapment. I think this was smart move by the FBI.
ReplyDeleteIt is situations like this why the Patriot Act is a necessity. It's naive to think that itinfringes on the rights of other when it clearly saves lives. Anyone that plans or wants to take part in a terrorist attack has no rights becausethey are attempting to kill as amny other people as they can for their own pleasure. This was a long period of time and he could of backed out at any time but didn't so clearly he meant to go through with it. Finally, he tried to detonate the bomb but was unsuccesful so he had the full intention of committing this terrorist attack.
ReplyDeleteI think that what the undercover agent did was the right thing because he stopped a terrorist from killing many Americans. I also think that it is crazy that Daoud was praying to kill a bunch of people and that he thought it was okay to do it. In my opinion, Daoud deserves to go to prison for life.
ReplyDeleteDaoud should go to prison for life. There is no way that killing innocent people is okay at any standards. I believe that terrorism is the worst crime that someone can commit against the country. The FBI took the necessary steps they needed to and I believe that the FBI did a great job.
ReplyDelete-Popo
America wins once again over the unreasonable losers called terrorists. However, the American victory isn't the only object of fascination in this article. The most interesting tidbit for me would be the fact that potential terrorists discuss jihad and violent acts together in an online forum. Is that considered free speech? Or has the first amendment been interpeted too literally? The issue can be debated both ways. I also find it interesting how the agent has to allow the crime to occurr without helping the perpatrator committ the crime. "Stings" can be very tricky to hold up in court, and I would imagine that the defendant attempts to argue that the agent encouraged the crime. I can't describe the situation with legal terms, so that entire thought may be misinterpreted. Alright good stuff.
ReplyDelete-Peter Kolb
I believe that the actions of the undercover government agent are completely justified. ALthough he helped to create he plan in a way, he completely fooled these potenial terrorists by easily making it look like he was one of them. In this case, lying to catch these people was completely fine and and I support what the government did. I hope that all of these terrorists that have been caught never see the outside of a prison cell again.
ReplyDeleteI think that it was really smart of the FBI the way that they approached the situation. I hope that this situation sends a message to future terrorists that they will get out smarted.
ReplyDeleteThe undercover agent i believe is justified, also he would have had to wait untill the attack to get to the leaders or suppliers of the explocives, why take down one little fish when you can take outan entire cell. therefor i believe that the agent is justified in his actions.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe the actions of the undercover agents was ok. They kind of pushed him to do it, if they wouldn't have pushed him he might have not done it. I think peer pressure was a contributing factor to his actions. However I do believe that therd are certain circumstances that this would be ok with me.
ReplyDeleteAlex colter
I think that this man should go to jail.Even if the agent helped him get the bombs and make the plan he still went through with it and tried to harm a ton of people. He went through with trying to kill people therefore he needs to go to jail for a long time.
ReplyDeleteI am glad that Doud didn't kill anyone. The undercover cops did the right thing and what they did was completely justified.The cops helped cath Daoud they fooled him and cuaght him and his plan. I think that undercover cops are great and they help keep our nation strong
ReplyDeleteIthink that what the undercover agent did was completely the right thing to do. He fooled a terrorist into thinking he was one of them and it worked. I think what the government did was the right thing.
ReplyDeleteI think that this is pretty scary. Is scary to know that a 19 year old kid can get everything that he needs to make a bomb. I feel that the kid deserves what was givin to him in terms of punishment. The undercover cop did the right thing. I think that undercover cops are a great thing. However, we can just switch to only undercover cops
ReplyDeleteEverything the undercover agent did was justifiable because he was doing it to catch the guy. Although on thesurface he appeared to be unethical and very dangerous, I believe it was necessary. Daoud should go to prison for life for being such an idiot, thinking he could get away with it.
ReplyDeleteI think the undercover agent did the right thing. Hes doing his job and he is keeping people safe. I think the 19 year old should go to jail for a long time even though he didnt kill anyone; its the fact that he tried to kill people.
ReplyDeleteI am really glad to hear this. The law enforcement did their job and it helps me know that i can rely on the law enforcment for my saftey. The kid should go to prison for this. It would be unconstutional for him not to.
ReplyDeleteReally happy that this didn't happen. Clutch performance by the law enforcement personel. Gives me lots of confidence in our security and defense system. Hopefully heavy punishments will be coming down on this person.
ReplyDeleteI think this is an awesome story. I love hearing about undercover agents because it makes me gain so much respect for people in law enforcement. They get as close to the threat as possible, to the point where they are the threat, so it seems. It's amazing how someone like the terrorist can't figure out that his "partner" is a mole. I'm very glad there's men willing to risk their lives on this level for our safety.
ReplyDelete--Joe Morris